THE YOUTHFUL AUGUSTINE YESTERDAY AND TODAY:

ANY LESSONS FOR ME AS A YOUTH?

OPENING STATEMENT

As a youth, I feel very obliged to write down this piece. My feelings are inspired by the fact that I have to connect the term or better still, the reality of the word “youth”, with the life of St Augustine; this is with the intention of situating it within the youthful content, giving it an Augustinian mark and spark. My experiences are my major source of inspiration, the experience of a youth, who has lived according to the Augustinian way of life for more than five years. This does not in any way make me the best candidate for writing this piece, No. But it makes me, as other Augustinian students, suited for this kind of academic-cum-spiritual exercise.

THE TERM-YOUTH

The word “youth” according to the Encarta dictionary of English learning is a time when somebody is young: a period of human life between childhood and maturity. It may also refer to the state of being young or to a young man or woman in his/her teens or early twenties. One may refer to it as a state or a period of inexperience, for if we are to refer to adulthood as a mature state of great experience, then the youth falls short. Nonetheless, the youth is a step beyond the infant stage/childhood or the stage of “teen-hood”. It is a state of great zeal and exploration, a time of making and breaking new ground, a time to make good one's numerous aspirations come to fruition. It is a time of heavy mistakes and regrets and if not well directed, could cause very many upsets in latter times of one's life. It is a period of a lot of energy, a period to make use of this energy for ones benefit or for one's destruction. It is a period of selfishness, but unlike that of the teen, it is not a period when one thinks that the world begins and ends with oneself. It is rather a period when one comes to appreciate the eventuality that life has bestowed on oneself and to the community. Whereas the teen looks for attention in everything he/she does, the youth is very much in the know of who he/she is and what he/she wants. The youth thus acts accordingly. This is not to say that there are no exceptions, for there are youths who still seek attention and depend on people's nod when confronted with situations. And yet, man is a being who seeks attention, so the youth does not act any different. But as compared to the teen years, the attention sought by the youth in wanting to be acknowledged, is not extreme. From all that has been described one may think that the youth is very much like the teen; true. To add to this, the teen is like the child and the adult is like the youth. This goes to imply that there are many factors that work on man to make him what he is, namely environmental, social and religious etc. The youth may possess the same qualities as the teen, but he is differentiated by the fact of his maturity, after having gone through the stage of “teen-hood”.

One very strong point of this period is the drive to attain joy. Man is driven by and towards that which will give him happiness and fulfillment; in a word, joy. The youth is one whose drive for joy can earn him regret, if not well harnessed. He may attain this joy, but may do this at the cost of his life. We have earlier asserted that this period is one of energy; this is what makes it perilous, for with such energy, the youth will do all that is in his/her power to actualize his/her dreams, goals and potentials. In such a situation, the youth is thus termed restless; his restlessness resides in his/her drive to attain to joy. They would do anything to make sure that he achieves it. This drive for joy is appropriated in varying ways, for while some youths are drawn to work hard, others would be drawn to laziness. In spite of this, joy is what motivates both. Again some would go to any extent to attain this joy- some will steal, kill, and engage in acts of fornication etc, all for pleasure. It is a state of passion, one that can again be wrongly or rightly channelled. Others are drawn remarkably into religion with the full conviction that in God resides their joy, and their joy is fulfilled in Him. These are often unfortunately termed holy holy. This stage if channelled wrongly can produce socio-psychological instability that is unprecedented. In the adults resides wisdom, some of which are evil-inclined. These adults make use of the energy of these youths, as instruments of their ulterior motives, promising these youths false pleasure that their hearts earnestly seek. In their folly, the youths, in a zombie-like fashion follow suit (this has accounted for the violence in the world today- in Africa, the Middle East, Europe, until recently England, and indeed the whole world). This folly is characterized by inexperience. In such a state, they can easily be deceived, as they have always been. It is a period of stubbornness, when one believes that one knows what is best, which includes the pleasure sought after.

AUGUSTINE AS A YOUTH

St Augustine's life was no different from the above list of characteristic of youthful state. His was very much like ours, a search for joy, for happiness, one that made him take a woman outside the holy union (although one that made him live in fidelity to that woman). This union with an unknown woman indicates the kind of internal struggle, St Augustine had to battle greatly with, a life of sin, of lust (which I insist was no different than what youths today experience). Other youthful habits of Augustine include a series of selfish ambitions and dreams, continued mischief with his friends in the neighbourhood, a life of utmost disobedience and disregard for his mother's warnings, a life that was marked by a desire to attain intellectual heights. In the Conf, 2, 3, 5, for example, he tells us that in his “sixteenth year”, he was already through with his high school studies, a remarkable and rare feat. He later informs us that he read the Hortensius of Cicero, at the age of nineteen, again a remarkable feat, for one at such age. (Fr. Emmanuel Czar Alvarez, OSA, p1) We can thus deduce from this that in his intellect, lay his strength, and he was poised to developing it. This led him away from his mother and his country of birth, in search of a life as an intellectual. His flair for rationality, made him question the faith of his mother, as not acceptable, making him try out some religious sects, renouncing thus the Christian religion. In spite of his intelligence, he had some difficulties in some academic areas (one would not expect such from the like of Augustine). But he made mention of his hatred for Greek. He insists “I hated the Greek that was dinned into me in early boyhood” (ibid, p7). What I want to draw from this is that Augustine was a normal youth, and not a super youth of any sort.

A LESSON FOR YOUTHS

The youthful life of St Augustine fits into what the young people experience today. Whether one is battling with one’s lustful passions, or craving to carve out a niche for one self in academic life, or being stubborn or the knack in disregarding rules and regulations of a given system, or the pleasure one derives from outwitting others, making others suffer pain, or the joy in what one has acquired through mischief, or being sinful, St Augustine becomes a pedestal and beacon of hope to young people.

Augustine remarks that “People delight only in what they love; but they love only what they want to love” (Prayer 3). In the case of the youth, he delights in having constant happiness and joy. This is what he/she loves and thus delights in; the youth wants to be happy. Augustine will further go on to assert that: “it does not follow that everyone who attains what he/she loves is happy” (Prayer). Happiness for Augustine consists in “permanent possession and everlasting love of the Supreme Being, the Supreme Good, which is God” (Prayer 5). In his opinion, you will not be happy if you are unable to possess what you love, be that what it may; nor can you be happy if you do not love what you have, be it ever so good; nor even if you are able to have what you love, if it be harmful to you (you will still not be happy, my addition). To be happy thus, a man must have what he has, and love what he has, and it must be something that will do him no harm (Prayer 4). This is only attainable with and in the Supreme Being, Good- God; no mundane, created good can satisfy this.

From the life of St Augustine, youths should understand that in life there can be no substitute to possessing God. The joy and happiness the youth longs for is only attained in ‘possessive’ communion with God, for He is the source of all joy and happiness. One may imagine that situating oneself within the boundless joy of God is a waste of time. The youth will ask: is going to church or seeking God able to give me the joy I desire? In our contemporary world, where everything is moving at a supersonic speed, would seeking God not slow down my programmes? I am preparing for a job interview. Is there need to pray, or should I be reading and scouting for the best way to outwit the rest? I am looking for a husband or wife, should I consult God or I should pick the one that my heart goes for, the one that would attend to my bodily needs? In all things that my heart goes for, should there be a ‘possessive’ communion with God, a fellowship? St Augustine speaks to you and me today, as he says: fulfillment lies with and in God. One does not have to become a priest or a nun, to have this fulfillment.

Fulfillment resides in us, as God's children. As adopted children of God, born in the blood of Jesus, this fulfillment can only be activated; it can only become real in communion with God. Fulfillment lies dormant in us as God's children. He who gives such fulfillment expects that we wilfully cooperate with Him in making this come to bear in our lives. It behooves on us to look inwards and appreciate the living existence of God in us. It entails allowing God to actively participate in our daily activities, by being in communion with Him. This communion can only be achieved through prayer. In fact, PRAYER is the means to which the communion and possession meant by Augustine, is attained, and is the chief lesson for the youth in his inexperience.

Youths constantly grapple with the meaning of life and as such they come in contact with many errors after many trials, trying to make things work, for their good. We should take cue from St Augustine, who after his many trials and errors, was able to remark “Late have I known you Oh beauty ever ancient ever new” (St Augustine's Confessions Bk X, 27(38)). Such was the cry of an adult who regretted his youthful life, led in the absence of God. St Augustine was able to find out that the joy that his heart so sought after was within him. He remarked, “Behold, Thou were within, and I without, and there did I seek Thee; I, unlovely, rushed heedlessly among the things of beauty: Thou madest” (ibid). This enlightenment that St Augustine got was not something that was alien to him, and was made known. It was something that had ever been with him, to which he was blind to seeing. He states: “Thou were with me, but I was not with Thee. Those things kept me far from Thee, which, unless they were in Thee, were not” (ibid). This blindness was occasioned by his consideration of created things, more than the Creator of things. It meant that he was to locate this joy within the boundless love of the Creator, in whom all things “live, move and have their being” (cf Acts17:28). God was a reality ever present that Augustine was never aware of, as it is with most youths today, even those that consider themselves religious, in the broader sense of the term.

In the midst of it all, we should ask St Augustine himself, whether he was ever satisfied? Was there fulfillment after he attained to his numerous earthly achievements? We should be well aware that he achieved all he set out to achieve: for in lust, he found a woman who bore him a son and in intellectual ambition, he attained a chair in the university. Augustine was never satisfied till he entered into deep fellowship with Love. Communion with God thus entails that we allow, Love, which is God, to lead the way. Augustine insists that the only way to attain joy is to possess God in love and the only way our love for God is measured, is not by how we feel, but by how we live; not by sentimentality and emotion, but by our conduct and behaviour (Prayer 32). By bringing love into the practical realm, we give free rein to its power in our beings to inwardly possess and transform, and outwardly project as a light to and for the world. This joy the youth longs for is not only in the possessing of love via communion, it is also in the living in love, again via communion, for in communion, we possess, and in possessing we commune.

Let me conclude by recalling the chorus of a song composed by the defunct English female group- the Spice Girls, which captures the sentiments and rationality of a youth, which shows him as inexperienced, but has the capacity he hardly realizes: “Part of me laughs, part of me cries, part of me wants to question why. Why is there joy, why is there pain, why is there sunshine and the rain. One day you are here, next you are gone…just keep your faith and let Love lead the way. For everything will work out fine if you let Love (God), lead the way.”

References:

Fr. Emmanuel Czar Alvarez, OSA. A paper seminar given to the Augustinian students in Nigeria (24^th-27^th June, 2011).

St Augustine's confessions Bk X, 27(38)

Thomas A Hand OSA, ST AUGUSTINE ON PRAYER, Dublin, Gill and Son, 1963.

THE YOUTHFUL AUGUSTINE YESTERDAY AND TODAY: ANY LESSONS FOR ME AS A YOUTH?

THE YOUTHFUL AUGUSTINE YESTERDAY AND TODAY:

ANY LESSONS FOR ME AS A YOUTH?

OPENING STATEMENT

As a youth, I feel very obliged to write down this piece. My feelings are inspired by the fact that I have to connect the term or better still, the reality of the word “youth”, with the life of St Augustine; this is with the intention of situating it within the youthful content, giving it an Augustinian mark and spark. My experiences are my major source of inspiration, the experience of a youth, who has lived according to the Augustinian way of life for more than five years. This does not in any way make me the best candidate for writing this piece, No. But it makes me, as other Augustinian students, suited for this kind of academic-cum-spiritual exercise.

THE TERM-YOUTH

The word “youth” according to the Encarta dictionary of English learning is a time when somebody is young: a period of human life between childhood and maturity. It may also refer to the state of being young or to a young man or woman in his/her teens or early twenties. One may refer to it as a state or a period of inexperience, for if we are to refer to adulthood as a mature state of great experience, then the youth falls short. Nonetheless, the youth is a step beyond the infant stage/childhood or the stage of “teen-hood”. It is a state of great zeal and exploration, a time of making and breaking new ground, a time to make good one's numerous aspirations come to fruition. It is a time of heavy mistakes and regrets and if not well directed, could cause very many upsets in latter times of one's life. It is a period of a lot of energy, a period to make use of this energy for ones benefit or for one's destruction. It is a period of selfishness, but unlike that of the teen, it is not a period when one thinks that the world begins and ends with oneself. It is rather a period when one comes to appreciate the eventuality that life has bestowed on oneself and to the community. Whereas the teen looks for attention in everything he/she does, the youth is very much in the know of who he/she is and what he/she wants. The youth thus acts accordingly. This is not to say that there are no exceptions, for there are youths who still seek attention and depend on people's nod when confronted with situations. And yet, man is a being who seeks attention, so the youth does not act any different. But as compared to the teen years, the attention sought by the youth in wanting to be acknowledged, is not extreme. From all that has been described one may think that the youth is very much like the teen; true. To add to this, the teen is like the child and the adult is like the youth. This goes to imply that there are many factors that work on man to make him what he is, namely environmental, social and religious etc. The youth may possess the same qualities as the teen, but he is differentiated by the fact of his maturity, after having gone through the stage of “teen-hood”.

One very strong point of this period is the drive to attain joy. Man is driven by and towards that which will give him happiness and fulfillment; in a word, joy. The youth is one whose drive for joy can earn him regret, if not well harnessed. He may attain this joy, but may do this at the cost of his life. We have earlier asserted that this period is one of energy; this is what makes it perilous, for with such energy, the youth will do all that is in his/her power to actualize his/her dreams, goals and potentials. In such a situation, the youth is thus termed restless; his restlessness resides in his/her drive to attain to joy. They would do anything to make sure that he achieves it. This drive for joy is appropriated in varying ways, for while some youths are drawn to work hard, others would be drawn to laziness. In spite of this, joy is what motivates both. Again some would go to any extent to attain this joy- some will steal, kill, and engage in acts of fornication etc, all for pleasure. It is a state of passion, one that can again be wrongly or rightly channelled. Others are drawn remarkably into religion with the full conviction that in God resides their joy, and their joy is fulfilled in Him. These are often unfortunately termed holy holy. This stage if channelled wrongly can produce socio-psychological instability that is unprecedented. In the adults resides wisdom, some of which are evil-inclined. These adults make use of the energy of these youths, as instruments of their ulterior motives, promising these youths false pleasure that their hearts earnestly seek. In their folly, the youths, in a zombie-like fashion follow suit (this has accounted for the violence in the world today- in Africa, the Middle East, Europe, until recently England, and indeed the whole world). This folly is characterized by inexperience. In such a state, they can easily be deceived, as they have always been. It is a period of stubbornness, when one believes that one knows what is best, which includes the pleasure sought after.

AUGUSTINE AS A YOUTH

St Augustine's life was no different from the above list of characteristic of youthful state. His was very much like ours, a search for joy, for happiness, one that made him take a woman outside the holy union (although one that made him live in fidelity to that woman). This union with an unknown woman indicates the kind of internal struggle, St Augustine had to battle greatly with, a life of sin, of lust (which I insist was no different than what youths today experience). Other youthful habits of Augustine include a series of selfish ambitions and dreams, continued mischief with his friends in the neighbourhood, a life of utmost disobedience and disregard for his mother's warnings, a life that was marked by a desire to attain intellectual heights. In the Conf, 2, 3, 5, for example, he tells us that in his “sixteenth year”, he was already through with his high school studies, a remarkable and rare feat. He later informs us that he read the Hortensius of Cicero, at the age of nineteen, again a remarkable feat, for one at such age. (Fr. Emmanuel Czar Alvarez, OSA, p1) We can thus deduce from this that in his intellect, lay his strength, and he was poised to developing it. This led him away from his mother and his country of birth, in search of a life as an intellectual. His flair for rationality, made him question the faith of his mother, as not acceptable, making him try out some religious sects, renouncing thus the Christian religion. In spite of his intelligence, he had some difficulties in some academic areas (one would not expect such from the like of Augustine). But he made mention of his hatred for Greek. He insists “I hated the Greek that was dinned into me in early boyhood” (ibid, p7). What I want to draw from this is that Augustine was a normal youth, and not a super youth of any sort.

A LESSON FOR YOUTHS

The youthful life of St Augustine fits into what the young people experience today. Whether one is battling with one’s lustful passions, or craving to carve out a niche for one self in academic life, or being stubborn or the knack in disregarding rules and regulations of a given system, or the pleasure one derives from outwitting others, making others suffer pain, or the joy in what one has acquired through mischief, or being sinful, St Augustine becomes a pedestal and beacon of hope to young people.

Augustine remarks that “People delight only in what they love; but they love only what they want to love” (Prayer 3). In the case of the youth, he delights in having constant happiness and joy. This is what he/she loves and thus delights in; the youth wants to be happy. Augustine will further go on to assert that: “it does not follow that everyone who attains what he/she loves is happy” (Prayer). Happiness for Augustine consists in “permanent possession and everlasting love of the Supreme Being, the Supreme Good, which is God” (Prayer 5). In his opinion, you will not be happy if you are unable to possess what you love, be that what it may; nor can you be happy if you do not love what you have, be it ever so good; nor even if you are able to have what you love, if it be harmful to you (you will still not be happy, my addition). To be happy thus, a man must have what he has, and love what he has, and it must be something that will do him no harm (Prayer 4). This is only attainable with and in the Supreme Being, Good- God; no mundane, created good can satisfy this.

From the life of St Augustine, youths should understand that in life there can be no substitute to possessing God. The joy and happiness the youth longs for is only attained in ‘possessive’ communion with God, for He is the source of all joy and happiness. One may imagine that situating oneself within the boundless joy of God is a waste of time. The youth will ask: is going to church or seeking God able to give me the joy I desire? In our contemporary world, where everything is moving at a supersonic speed, would seeking God not slow down my programmes? I am preparing for a job interview. Is there need to pray, or should I be reading and scouting for the best way to outwit the rest? I am looking for a husband or wife, should I consult God or I should pick the one that my heart goes for, the one that would attend to my bodily needs? In all things that my heart goes for, should there be a ‘possessive’ communion with God, a fellowship? St Augustine speaks to you and me today, as he says: fulfillment lies with and in God. One does not have to become a priest or a nun, to have this fulfillment.

Fulfillment resides in us, as God's children. As adopted children of God, born in the blood of Jesus, this fulfillment can only be activated; it can only become real in communion with God. Fulfillment lies dormant in us as God's children. He who gives such fulfillment expects that we wilfully cooperate with Him in making this come to bear in our lives. It behooves on us to look inwards and appreciate the living existence of God in us. It entails allowing God to actively participate in our daily activities, by being in communion with Him. This communion can only be achieved through prayer. In fact, PRAYER is the means to which the communion and possession meant by Augustine, is attained, and is the chief lesson for the youth in his inexperience.

Youths constantly grapple with the meaning of life and as such they come in contact with many errors after many trials, trying to make things work, for their good. We should take cue from St Augustine, who after his many trials and errors, was able to remark “Late have I known you Oh beauty ever ancient ever new” (St Augustine's Confessions Bk X, 27(38)). Such was the cry of an adult who regretted his youthful life, led in the absence of God. St Augustine was able to find out that the joy that his heart so sought after was within him. He remarked, “Behold, Thou were within, and I without, and there did I seek Thee; I, unlovely, rushed heedlessly among the things of beauty: Thou madest” (ibid). This enlightenment that St Augustine got was not something that was alien to him, and was made known. It was something that had ever been with him, to which he was blind to seeing. He states: “Thou were with me, but I was not with Thee. Those things kept me far from Thee, which, unless they were in Thee, were not” (ibid). This blindness was occasioned by his consideration of created things, more than the Creator of things. It meant that he was to locate this joy within the boundless love of the Creator, in whom all things “live, move and have their being” (cf Acts17:28). God was a reality ever present that Augustine was never aware of, as it is with most youths today, even those that consider themselves religious, in the broader sense of the term.

In the midst of it all, we should ask St Augustine himself, whether he was ever satisfied? Was there fulfillment after he attained to his numerous earthly achievements? We should be well aware that he achieved all he set out to achieve: for in lust, he found a woman who bore him a son and in intellectual ambition, he attained a chair in the university. Augustine was never satisfied till he entered into deep fellowship with Love. Communion with God thus entails that we allow, Love, which is God, to lead the way. Augustine insists that the only way to attain joy is to possess God in love and the only way our love for God is measured, is not by how we feel, but by how we live; not by sentimentality and emotion, but by our conduct and behaviour (Prayer 32). By bringing love into the practical realm, we give free rein to its power in our beings to inwardly possess and transform, and outwardly project as a light to and for the world. This joy the youth longs for is not only in the possessing of love via communion, it is also in the living in love, again via communion, for in communion, we possess, and in possessing we commune.

Let me conclude by recalling the chorus of a song composed by the defunct English female group- the Spice Girls, which captures the sentiments and rationality of a youth, which shows him as inexperienced, but has the capacity he hardly realizes: “Part of me laughs, part of me cries, part of me wants to question why. Why is there joy, why is there pain, why is there sunshine and the rain. One day you are here, next you are gone…just keep your faith and let Love lead the way. For everything will work out fine if you let Love (God), lead the way.”

References:

Fr. Emmanuel Czar Alvarez, OSA. A paper seminar given to the Augustinian students in Nigeria (24^th-27^th June, 2011).

St Augustine's confessions Bk X, 27(38)

Thomas A Hand OSA, ST AUGUSTINE ON PRAYER, Dublin, Gill and Son, 1963.

THE YOUTHFUL AUGUSTINE YESTERDAY AND TODAY: ANY LESSONS FOR ME AS A YOUTH?

THE YOUTHFUL AUGUSTINE YESTERDAY AND TODAY:

ANY LESSONS FOR ME AS A YOUTH?

OPENING STATEMENT

As a youth, I feel very obliged to write down this piece. My feelings are inspired by the fact that I have to connect the term or better still, the reality of the word “youth”, with the life of St Augustine; this is with the intention of situating it within the youthful content, giving it an Augustinian mark and spark. My experiences are my major source of inspiration, the experience of a youth, who has lived according to the Augustinian way of life for more than five years. This does not in any way make me the best candidate for writing this piece, No. But it makes me, as other Augustinian students, suited for this kind of academic-cum-spiritual exercise.

THE TERM-YOUTH

The word “youth” according to the Encarta dictionary of English learning is a time when somebody is young: a period of human life between childhood and maturity. It may also refer to the state of being young or to a young man or woman in his/her teens or early twenties. One may refer to it as a state or a period of inexperience, for if we are to refer to adulthood as a mature state of great experience, then the youth falls short. Nonetheless, the youth is a step beyond the infant stage/childhood or the stage of “teen-hood”. It is a state of great zeal and exploration, a time of making and breaking new ground, a time to make good one's numerous aspirations come to fruition. It is a time of heavy mistakes and regrets and if not well directed, could cause very many upsets in latter times of one's life. It is a period of a lot of energy, a period to make use of this energy for ones benefit or for one's destruction. It is a period of selfishness, but unlike that of the teen, it is not a period when one thinks that the world begins and ends with oneself. It is rather a period when one comes to appreciate the eventuality that life has bestowed on oneself and to the community. Whereas the teen looks for attention in everything he/she does, the youth is very much in the know of who he/she is and what he/she wants. The youth thus acts accordingly. This is not to say that there are no exceptions, for there are youths who still seek attention and depend on people's nod when confronted with situations. And yet, man is a being who seeks attention, so the youth does not act any different. But as compared to the teen years, the attention sought by the youth in wanting to be acknowledged, is not extreme. From all that has been described one may think that the youth is very much like the teen; true. To add to this, the teen is like the child and the adult is like the youth. This goes to imply that there are many factors that work on man to make him what he is, namely environmental, social and religious etc. The youth may possess the same qualities as the teen, but he is differentiated by the fact of his maturity, after having gone through the stage of “teen-hood”.

One very strong point of this period is the drive to attain joy. Man is driven by and towards that which will give him happiness and fulfillment; in a word, joy. The youth is one whose drive for joy can earn him regret, if not well harnessed. He may attain this joy, but may do this at the cost of his life. We have earlier asserted that this period is one of energy; this is what makes it perilous, for with such energy, the youth will do all that is in his/her power to actualize his/her dreams, goals and potentials. In such a situation, the youth is thus termed restless; his restlessness resides in his/her drive to attain to joy. They would do anything to make sure that he achieves it. This drive for joy is appropriated in varying ways, for while some youths are drawn to work hard, others would be drawn to laziness. In spite of this, joy is what motivates both. Again some would go to any extent to attain this joy- some will steal, kill, and engage in acts of fornication etc, all for pleasure. It is a state of passion, one that can again be wrongly or rightly channelled. Others are drawn remarkably into religion with the full conviction that in God resides their joy, and their joy is fulfilled in Him. These are often unfortunately termed holy holy. This stage if channelled wrongly can produce socio-psychological instability that is unprecedented. In the adults resides wisdom, some of which are evil-inclined. These adults make use of the energy of these youths, as instruments of their ulterior motives, promising these youths false pleasure that their hearts earnestly seek. In their folly, the youths, in a zombie-like fashion follow suit (this has accounted for the violence in the world today- in Africa, the Middle East, Europe, until recently England, and indeed the whole world). This folly is characterized by inexperience. In such a state, they can easily be deceived, as they have always been. It is a period of stubbornness, when one believes that one knows what is best, which includes the pleasure sought after.

AUGUSTINE AS A YOUTH

St Augustine's life was no different from the above list of characteristic of youthful state. His was very much like ours, a search for joy, for happiness, one that made him take a woman outside the holy union (although one that made him live in fidelity to that woman). This union with an unknown woman indicates the kind of internal struggle, St Augustine had to battle greatly with, a life of sin, of lust (which I insist was no different than what youths today experience). Other youthful habits of Augustine include a series of selfish ambitions and dreams, continued mischief with his friends in the neighbourhood, a life of utmost disobedience and disregard for his mother's warnings, a life that was marked by a desire to attain intellectual heights. In the Conf, 2, 3, 5, for example, he tells us that in his “sixteenth year”, he was already through with his high school studies, a remarkable and rare feat. He later informs us that he read the Hortensius of Cicero, at the age of nineteen, again a remarkable feat, for one at such age. (Fr. Emmanuel Czar Alvarez, OSA, p1) We can thus deduce from this that in his intellect, lay his strength, and he was poised to developing it. This led him away from his mother and his country of birth, in search of a life as an intellectual. His flair for rationality, made him question the faith of his mother, as not acceptable, making him try out some religious sects, renouncing thus the Christian religion. In spite of his intelligence, he had some difficulties in some academic areas (one would not expect such from the like of Augustine). But he made mention of his hatred for Greek. He insists “I hated the Greek that was dinned into me in early boyhood” (ibid, p7). What I want to draw from this is that Augustine was a normal youth, and not a super youth of any sort.

A LESSON FOR YOUTHS

The youthful life of St Augustine fits into what the young people experience today. Whether one is battling with one’s lustful passions, or craving to carve out a niche for one self in academic life, or being stubborn or the knack in disregarding rules and regulations of a given system, or the pleasure one derives from outwitting others, making others suffer pain, or the joy in what one has acquired through mischief, or being sinful, St Augustine becomes a pedestal and beacon of hope to young people.

Augustine remarks that “People delight only in what they love; but they love only what they want to love” (Prayer 3). In the case of the youth, he delights in having constant happiness and joy. This is what he/she loves and thus delights in; the youth wants to be happy. Augustine will further go on to assert that: “it does not follow that everyone who attains what he/she loves is happy” (Prayer). Happiness for Augustine consists in “permanent possession and everlasting love of the Supreme Being, the Supreme Good, which is God” (Prayer 5). In his opinion, you will not be happy if you are unable to possess what you love, be that what it may; nor can you be happy if you do not love what you have, be it ever so good; nor even if you are able to have what you love, if it be harmful to you (you will still not be happy, my addition). To be happy thus, a man must have what he has, and love what he has, and it must be something that will do him no harm (Prayer 4). This is only attainable with and in the Supreme Being, Good- God; no mundane, created good can satisfy this.

From the life of St Augustine, youths should understand that in life there can be no substitute to possessing God. The joy and happiness the youth longs for is only attained in ‘possessive’ communion with God, for He is the source of all joy and happiness. One may imagine that situating oneself within the boundless joy of God is a waste of time. The youth will ask: is going to church or seeking God able to give me the joy I desire? In our contemporary world, where everything is moving at a supersonic speed, would seeking God not slow down my programmes? I am preparing for a job interview. Is there need to pray, or should I be reading and scouting for the best way to outwit the rest? I am looking for a husband or wife, should I consult God or I should pick the one that my heart goes for, the one that would attend to my bodily needs? In all things that my heart goes for, should there be a ‘possessive’ communion with God, a fellowship? St Augustine speaks to you and me today, as he says: fulfillment lies with and in God. One does not have to become a priest or a nun, to have this fulfillment.

Fulfillment resides in us, as God's children. As adopted children of God, born in the blood of Jesus, this fulfillment can only be activated; it can only become real in communion with God. Fulfillment lies dormant in us as God's children. He who gives such fulfillment expects that we wilfully cooperate with Him in making this come to bear in our lives. It behooves on us to look inwards and appreciate the living existence of God in us. It entails allowing God to actively participate in our daily activities, by being in communion with Him. This communion can only be achieved through prayer. In fact, PRAYER is the means to which the communion and possession meant by Augustine, is attained, and is the chief lesson for the youth in his inexperience.

Youths constantly grapple with the meaning of life and as such they come in contact with many errors after many trials, trying to make things work, for their good. We should take cue from St Augustine, who after his many trials and errors, was able to remark “Late have I known you Oh beauty ever ancient ever new” (St Augustine's Confessions Bk X, 27(38)). Such was the cry of an adult who regretted his youthful life, led in the absence of God. St Augustine was able to find out that the joy that his heart so sought after was within him. He remarked, “Behold, Thou were within, and I without, and there did I seek Thee; I, unlovely, rushed heedlessly among the things of beauty: Thou madest” (ibid). This enlightenment that St Augustine got was not something that was alien to him, and was made known. It was something that had ever been with him, to which he was blind to seeing. He states: “Thou were with me, but I was not with Thee. Those things kept me far from Thee, which, unless they were in Thee, were not” (ibid). This blindness was occasioned by his consideration of created things, more than the Creator of things. It meant that he was to locate this joy within the boundless love of the Creator, in whom all things “live, move and have their being” (cf Acts17:28). God was a reality ever present that Augustine was never aware of, as it is with most youths today, even those that consider themselves religious, in the broader sense of the term.

In the midst of it all, we should ask St Augustine himself, whether he was ever satisfied? Was there fulfillment after he attained to his numerous earthly achievements? We should be well aware that he achieved all he set out to achieve: for in lust, he found a woman who bore him a son and in intellectual ambition, he attained a chair in the university. Augustine was never satisfied till he entered into deep fellowship with Love. Communion with God thus entails that we allow, Love, which is God, to lead the way. Augustine insists that the only way to attain joy is to possess God in love and the only way our love for God is measured, is not by how we feel, but by how we live; not by sentimentality and emotion, but by our conduct and behaviour (Prayer 32). By bringing love into the practical realm, we give free rein to its power in our beings to inwardly possess and transform, and outwardly project as a light to and for the world. This joy the youth longs for is not only in the possessing of love via communion, it is also in the living in love, again via communion, for in communion, we possess, and in possessing we commune.

Let me conclude by recalling the chorus of a song composed by the defunct English female group- the Spice Girls, which captures the sentiments and rationality of a youth, which shows him as inexperienced, but has the capacity he hardly realizes: “Part of me laughs, part of me cries, part of me wants to question why. Why is there joy, why is there pain, why is there sunshine and the rain. One day you are here, next you are gone…just keep your faith and let Love lead the way. For everything will work out fine if you let Love (God), lead the way.”

References:

Fr. Emmanuel Czar Alvarez, OSA. A paper seminar given to the Augustinian students in Nigeria (24^th-27^th June, 2011).

St Augustine's confessions Bk X, 27(38)

Thomas A Hand OSA, ST AUGUSTINE ON PRAYER, Dublin, Gill and Son, 1963.

FEMINISM-WHAT ARE WE FIGHTING FOR?

In our class of Trinity, taught by the amiable Fr. Lawrence Hammawa, we discussed much about the feminist concept of the trinity. We how the much celebrated feminist- Elizabeth A. Johnson, proscribed that the dominating masculinity found in the bible and the church’s hierarchy, be done away with. She conceived God as a loving mother. You know, I have no problem whether God be a man or woman. And to be frank, I know that God doesn’t have a problem either, for this is not the first time people have construed God according to their own situation- the poor see him as a rich God, the lonely see Him as a loving friend, the widow see Him as a loving husband, the oppressed see Him as a liberator etc. All these conceptions do not bother God in the slightest, all that matter to God is that we know that He loves us and will do anything for us in love. This fact of man taking the order and lead in all things have actually not gone down well, in some quarters amongst the females. The truth about it all is that there is actually no fighting or discord. Why do I say this?

You see, there are two accounts of creation; there is that of Genesis 1, and 2. In these two conceptions of creation, one thing that cuts across is that, man was first created. Feminist see these as a ploy to put man before or higher than woman. Whether they think like this or not, it is harmful only to the extent that this can be used to create the already widening gulf between the man and the woman in life. In Genesis 1, it is said that God created man. Mankind, humanity, Adam: ““Let us make people* in our image, to be like ourselves. They will be masters over all life—the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, and all the livestock, wild animals,* and small animals.”So God created people in his own image; God patterned them after himself; male and female he created them (Gen1:26-27). In some other biblical versions, instead of people, it uses mankind, in some other versions, the used name is humanity. אָדָ֛ם (Gen 1:26 WTT), is the Hebrew rendition of the word that has been analyzed so far. And the Hebrew word means, man, Adam or mankind. In other words, it points to something that masculine. And yet the text developed further in verse27, that “male and female he created them”. As such it is evident that man, not generic, was not only created, but woman was created as well. Thus we can say that man and woman were created. We should not forget that the Jewish tradition did not regard women that much. In fact they did not regard them, as much as the Muslim world does. But if in their great distaste for the woman, they were able to indicate that God created man and woman in the same instant, it goes a lot to indicate how very misdirected we are about this struggle against masculinity by the women.

The second account of the making of man differs a lot from the first in that, it shows that man is the essence of the human kind. It indicates that woman is a product of man: “But still there was no companion suitable for him. So the Lord God caused Adam to fall into a deep sleep. He took one of Adam’s ribs* and closed up the place from which he had taken it. Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib and brought her to Adam. “At last!” Adam exclaimed. “She is part of my own flesh and bone! She will be called ‘woman,’ because she was taken out of a man.” (Gen2:20-23). The use of the word “rib” is more than what it signifies. It is not just the physical rib of man that was taken out, but it was an integral part of man that was taken out to make woman. It is the essence of man that was taken out to make a woman. It was himself that he as seeing in the woman. It was another him, and there was to be no contradiction in him. He was a unit, but with the making of the woman, he became a unity. Note that man greatly appreciated this and thanked God for such wisdom. Feminists may say that this account posits a sort of subordination. I would add here that the there is no subordination. And they will add, why would it not be the other way round- man taken out of woman? The vital point to note here is not who was taken out of whom, or who was created first. The essential point is that man was never complete without the woman, and vice versa. The point to note here is that man can never be fulfilled without his companion and this goes to put the woman at a very important place in the life of man.  For she is not just the person that completes man, she is man, and man is she. He cannot be what he is in this life without the woman. The woman thus has a pride of place in the life of man.

The account of the fall, presents the woman in a very bad light. And it brings out the wisdom of the inspired writers. For in reality, man’s only weakness has been and is the woman. The woman is like an Achilles’ heel, for man, having the power to do and undo, a power that comes with great responsibility, one that is actually known. For if the women actually knew the good they could do with this power of theirs, the world will be better off. Man fell not at the promptings of the devil, but at that of the woman. But man had no option; he did not doubt his wife, since she was himself in flesh and blood. He could not just doubt her. So if she had fallen he had to fall with her. How is the wisdom of the ancient writers made manifest? The answer is Mary. How were they able to know that it is a woman that will enable God to become flesh thereby undoing the first sin of man? The answer is that, they were inspired.

Down through the ages, it is a fact that women have been marginalized, in many traditions and societies. It should thus be asked, was this the will of the creator? No. God has always rejected all forms of oppression, for this is not a mark of His nature. The recent female struggle is in a good light, but should not be done in exaggeration. No amount of apology can undo the injustices committed to women in a male dominated society, true. We should not forget that man is not free from, and has never been free from error, yes we have made lots of mistakes and our ability to man amends is what makes us rational. The good thing is that there is an on-going women liberation and empowerment, but extreme positions should be watched.

As regards the men and women, there are varying functions, functions that come from their specific makeup. Man is man and woman is woman, this is a fact that is very much dogmatic and cannot be compromised, even though science is making us think anti-creation wise. Just like the trinity, there is no distinction between the man and the woman, they are the same. For in the trinity, there is the immanent and the economic trinity. The latter is what distinguishes the persons of the trinity. But the fact of the persons, three persons, being One in the Godhead, is still very prominent; they are three persons, but One God. Even with the rendition of the father as the unoriginated Origin, and the Son as the only begotten, and the Spirit as the one who proceeds from the father and the Son, there is yet no distinction. They are referred to as the Father, Son and Spirit, but there is not distinction between father and son and spirit, a distinction in the absolute. God is a Father, Son and Spirit, and yet one. They have performed differently in the salvation history, yet they are one. Get it, in the trinity; even though they differ in personality, they are Yet One God. They have specific functions to play, of which, One amongst the three participates actively, like Jesus, participated actively in redemption. This does not mean that the Father and Spirit were not in action, for they participated, passively, in passive action. God is One in creation, redemption and sanctification, HE is One.

Man and Woman, may differ in constitution and makeup, but there is no distinction, there is no superior or inferior in importance, but a community, a unity, a relationship, one that is complementary. The issue of who should dominate should not arise. The issue of whether one’s function is of more importance should not arise, for in all functions, they are still the same. There are peculiar functions that distinguish both, but they yet constitute one humanity. The feminist move has brought forth this realization, but it is gradually leading to a wrong conception in the story of human relations. The man is not more important than the woman, and the woman is not either than the man. They are both important. We ought to remember that in the order of creation, to maintain order, someone needs to be in charge. Humanity is in charge of creation. And yet in humanity, between the man and the woman, there is one that bears the responsibility of the lot- is it man or the woman? It is with respect to who is in charge that many years of subjugation of the woman, and in recent times the uprising of the feminist movement has gained grounds. In dealing with this question of who is the leader, we should not forget that between the man and the woman, no one is more important than the other, for in leadership, the leader is merely the first amongst equals. But thus concept of leadership between man and woman has opened the room for discord amongst them.

My belief is that man was put in charge by God, but not as an avenue to oppress and suppress the woman, but to take responsibility as part of his divine functions, just as the woman has her own responsibilities. The fact of leadership has always been given to the man, but this does not mean that the woman cannot be a leader. Remember that they are a unity, thus whether man leads or not, it is inconsequential, for if man leads the woman leads with him, if she leads he leads. This situation is one that should not provoke any discord. But humanity watch it, if you foster this thing to the extreme, then you will pave the way for evil to dominate.

Re: SEX IN THE FORBIDDEN ZONE- by Peter Rutter

are we that blameworthy?

It is entirely depressing to me, the book by Peter Rutter, sex in the forbidden zone.  Indeed a picture has been presented that has got me thinking in a rather confused way. I mean that I am thinking but at the same time, I am confused, confused at the fact that what I thought I knew is being overtly ruffled. I do not know how far, Peter went in his research and I also do not know how in depth he is with regard experiences of this sort. All I know that his book is thought provoking and at the same time very compelling. He seems to shift the blame from women to men. Indeed he works against the popular notion that in most cases of sexual misconduct in professions, particularly those that has to do with mentor and protégé, the men are to blame. They are to blame because all the women do is within the right to do so either because of a childhood deficit or because of societal demands. Imagine a case of a psychologist and his patient, a female. The female in one of her therapeutic sessions come out in a violently, sexual provoking way (when I say violently I do not mean physical violence). The men are touched at their weakest point and they fall. According to Peter, the man in authority has the responsibility to say no. I know that there are cases whereby the psychologist (the man in authority may very well include the lawyer, the clergy man, the teacher, even an artist. in fact anyone who stands in a position of authority, it must not certainly be a government official or a politician), may appeal for this and get his way without any court order knocking on his door steps for damages rendered to the woman. But are we saying that anytime there is, in the words of Peter Rutter, sex in the forbidden zone, the man is to blame? Are we saying that the woman has not part in this?

Peter defines sex in the forbidden zone as the fact of engaging in an unlawful sexual escapade in a professional situation. When I say professional situation, I do not mean that prostitutes or gigolos are to be considered here (but looking at this extensively, they may well be considered). I mean rather a situation that is built upon the edifice of trust, a situation that is summarily captured as one dealing with a mentor and a protégé, a situation that deals with one in authority and another under that authority. In his book peter says that this misconduct is based on the masculine domination of this world and the masculinity that that approaches every sphere of this life. It is based on the fact that the feminine is more docile and agreeable to the challenge of the masculine, it is hinged on the point that the masculine myths, which are three in number namely:

·         The woman’s deference

·         Her special powers

·         The woman as dark and destructive

In the first instance, the woman is meant to be at the beck and call of the advances of the man. She is taught to be the loving wife who gives to her husband, beautiful kids. The second instance provides the woman with the power to heal the wounded man, most particularly in a sexual way. This is due to her nurturing attitude. The third sees the woman as a destructive agent who makes the man suffer loss and rejection in the society. According to peter, this is the masculine myth that rules the society that is men controlled. The men are the challengers and the woman has been taught to give in to this challenge. Thus whenever the women acts in a seductive manner according to peter, it is because of the demands of a male dominated society. If she dresses provocatively, it is because she wants the admiration of men, which indeed boosts her self esteem. If she stylishly gives credence to her sexuality before a prospective male, it is make her noticed by the men. None of this is however intended for sexual gratification, even though peter is quick to say that as in men, women also desire sexual gratification, but are more able to express their emotions in a nonsexual way, which is interpreted sexually by the male. Since this is interprets thus, the male falls into such a mess. The woman comes out with the talk of “I had a crush on him, but it had nothing to do with sex. And I have regretted ever getting sexually involved with him. I am at a loss because of that…he has betrayed my trust…” The man comes out with the talk of “I was just responding to a want…she welded a power I could not resist…it is not my fault”. Peter says that the woman was just acting out in a male dominated world, thus the male should have towed the line of responsibility.

Let me be a novice in this area. Let me be naïve. I have every reason to believe that sexuality has a powerful influence on human beings. It should be said that men are more physical and women emotional. Since this is common knowledge then why would the woman provoke the man into acting physically? I agree with peter that women are capable of emotional love without the thought of being physical, but men are less adapted to this. Again since this is common knowledge, why would the woman provoke the man? She desires an emotional relationship, he desires a physical consummation. The woman thus goes to the furthest extent of preserving this relationship by consenting to the physical demands of the man. Can we say that inherent in that emotional desire, the desire of the physical is absent? I agree that men go overboard by means of their fantasy and would very much like to see to its actualization. This makes the woman the unfortunate prey. The fact that men dominate the world should give the woman no reason to live for the man. Let me state her that as much as women try to impress men with all their being, men also go the same extent. Do you disagree? Ask yourself, why would a man want to always look good? Even those that sag their trousers and put on ear rings, giving themselves tattoos, why would they do it? Is it merely for swag? There may be other reasons, but one inevitable one is for the reason of appearing sexually agreeable to his fans- women. Even the worst of criminals would want to be admired by the opposite sex. It is a fact that is common to both sexes. As such, why is it that it is the men that must always be responsible? Let us not imagine that it is only the woman that seduces, the man also has that power, and most make use of it. In men this is hardly noticeable simply because they are not women, period.

Is it true that when a woman is sexually provoking you, it has nothing to do with meeting with her animalistic want of that moment? Is it true that women are always the ones bearing the pains, most, after such violations?

Let it be said that men exude such powerful influence especially when they are in authority. Let it also be said that they almost, every time, look upon the love and concern shown them by the females as a call to consummation. But is peter trying to say that women do not provoke men? Is he trying to assert that even when they do they are in the right, because of male domination?

I do not believe that it is only the men that cross the boundaries of relationships, for women also do so. We should weigh the situation better, and ask ourselves, are the men always to be blamed? I know that women have been subjected to all forms of maltreatment from men, which is inexcusable, condemnable and wrong. I ask again, with regard to sex in the forbidden zone, are the men to be blamed, in all cases?

There is a fuller picture of this that was not presented by Peter. I will leave that for another time.

GOOD MORNING NIGERIA, WELCOME TO 2012

We celebrated the festivities of the previous year, 2011, with pomp and pageantry, with much eating and drinking, and as expected, the festivities in Lagos, was accompanied with loads a loads of noise. A friend of mine called me, during the New Year celebrations and heard the noise in the background. She was calling from Jos. She had to ask me what was happening. I told her that there is a great celebration going on. She was moved to ask: “is this how noisy Lagosians are?” Well I do not blame her for that, for us that have stayed most of our lives in Lagos, it is normal. In fact, it would have been abnormal if the state passed through the festivities without making noise. I recall on the hope we all had about the New Year and how the year was going to favour all the previous year had failed to favour. How it was going to multiply the fortunes of those that had loads of fortunes the previous year. How it was going to make better a good last year, and make good a bad last year. I am not recalling this to say that just two days into the New Year our hopes have been dashed, no. I am rather recalling this to state how deemed the illuminous-ness of this year has become. I wonder if people still make New Year’s resolution. I wonder if people make a resolution to make other people suffer. I wonder if people make resolutions to become worse than they have been. I wonder if people make resolutions to just be bad. The more I wonder, the more possible it seems to me. It seems possible, looking at the new prices of crude oil products. I am angered by the fact that in a country that produces oil, such a commodity should still be sold at a very high price. It is just like having a yam farm and still suffering from the lack of yams in the house. It is a situation of man’s hatred for himself. Nigeria, as a person, has debunked that thought that says that man loves himself more than he does his neighbor. The facts speak for it themselves- oil, raw material, produced, exported and imported as refined product; oil refineries in a state of ill health, a state that has defied all possible solutions. The government has tried and as her usual scorecard, failed to make the downstream sector, better, as she has tried with energy, commonly known as NEPA, even after its privatization to PHCN, as she has tried with corruption, as she has tried with NITEL, as she has tried in all sectors of the Nation’s economy. Someone should please tell me in what sector the Nigerian Government has produced an A. she has not even made an, agreeable, yet useless E8, it has always been the dreaded F9, which I think she is very proud to get. She has called upon her children to make good grades in academics, but the majority of her children are taking after her footsteps. Like mother like children. The removal of the fuel subsidy has been effected, Nigeria, you are on your way to a country free of corruption, as we have been assured. You are on your way to heaven; we should all rejoice and be glad. In fact, we should shout out in joy, for the inconsideration of the government to the teeming populace of this country. We should rejoice in the fact that the government has only a few people in mind, wanting the majority to die out. We should rejoice in the fact that the Nigeria, which was once in the light, but has for long been groping in the dark, would remain confined to that darkness for more years. We were told that deregulation would aid this country dearly. It was the theme song in the NTA: forwardi march oh! Deregulation. We were not allowed to enjoy any other song, it was only: forwardi march oh! Deregulation. Did that solve the problem of the downstream sector? It was said that if the prices increase, in the world over, the prices will increase in Nigeria and that if the reverse occurred the reverse would occur. For a time, I thought that this was actually a good thing. I thought that if the oil prices went low then fuel prices in Nigeria would come as low as probably N25 or even less. But my thoughts were never actualized, it went higher and higher, with divergent prices in many states in Nigeria. This was marked by reactions by the NLC, whose reactions were not capable of making the government move. We are now gearing up for another strike that will affect nothing, as usual. Pardon me for my negative attitude, but I guess I have been led to this, by the unruly behaviour of my mother- Nigeria. I do not want to speak of the untold suffering that would be unleashed. My aim is not to speak of this suffering, for even in my silence, the illiterate would write very beautifully, orally or in print, about the sufferings that this has brought them. In other words, experience would tell us better. I just want to show her that we have a mother who has refused to heed the request, the dying request of her children, making her unworthy of the name-mother. The more I think of it now, the more annoyed I get. This is because the one chief problem of Nigeria has not been solved, that which determines if this removal of subsidy would work. Jonathan, Okonjo Iwela and Sanusi Lamido should answer me, would this subsidy removal stop the corruption? We have been promised loads and loads of goodies that would come due to the heavy money that would be realized from this removal. But is it not enough? We have been promised times and times over, but nothing seems to be working. Again I ask would this action by the government stop the dreaded Boko Haram sect from bombing us into oblivion. Frankly speaking, I pity my president. Indeed I do not like this move of his, but I pity him. He has become that name that Nigerians would not want to hear, he has become that name that one would not want to give his/her child. He has become a scarecrow to all. He has been insulted and I guess that this is giving him quick rounds of grey hair, making him look older than himself. If he had just done the right thing. But let us ask, what should he have done, and what should he do now?